Match statistics snapshot
- SV Elversberg created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 1.49, Δ 0.29).
- SV Elversberg fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- SV Darmstadt 98 held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | Sv Darmstadt 98 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | Sv Darmstadt 98 |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 468Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | Sv Darmstadt 98 |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | Sv Darmstadt 98 |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | Sv Darmstadt 98 |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |