Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 2.07, Δ 0.66).
- Verl fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sv Sandhausen | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.07Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sv Sandhausen | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sv Sandhausen | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sv Sandhausen | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sv Sandhausen | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.