Match statistics snapshot
- Swansea created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.13, Δ 0.69).
- Swansea fired more attempts (16 vs 4 shots).
- Swansea was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Swansea | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.13 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Swansea | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 476Lead | Accurate passes | 145 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 235 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Swansea | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Swansea | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Swansea | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.