Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 2.34, Δ 0.52).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Telstar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.34Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Telstar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 161 | Accurate passes | 421Lead |
| 242 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Telstar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Telstar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.13 | Goals prevented | 0.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Telstar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.