Match statistics snapshot
- Cittadella fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Ternana was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 22%).
- Cittadella held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 321Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cittadella |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.