Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (28 vs 7 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
- Como held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ternana | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 4 |
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ternana | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 380Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ternana | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ternana | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 14Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ternana | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |