Match statistics snapshot
- Ternana fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Cosenza was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 18%).
- Cosenza held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 265 | Accurate passes | 339Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ternana | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.