Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Ternana was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 14%).
- Pisa held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ternana | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ternana | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 423Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ternana | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ternana | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ternana | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.