Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 0.35, Δ 0.68).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 408Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.