Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 1.03, Δ 0.82).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (21 vs 14 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 513Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 616Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.