Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.67 vs 1.42, Δ 0.25).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 378Lead |
| 264 | Total passes | 456Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |