Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (2.50 vs 1.34, Δ 1.16).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 302Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 396Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |