Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.78, Δ 0.36).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 541Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.