Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 1.04, Δ 0.51).
- Shandong Luneng was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 338Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |