Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.66, Δ 0.99).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.66Lead |
| 4Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 307 | Accurate passes | 452Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 523Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.