Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 2.70, Δ 1.76).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.70Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 167 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 254 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.