Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (2.67 vs 1.36, Δ 1.31).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (27 vs 10 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 227 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.