Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 0.94, Δ 1.04).
- Tianjin Teda fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 332Lead | Accurate passes | 321 |
| 392Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tianjin Teda | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.