Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Banfield held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Offsides | 9 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 280Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 358Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |