Match statistics snapshot
- Tigre fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Tigre was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 289Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 362Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigre | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.