Match statistics snapshot
- Tigre created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.32, Δ 0.81).
- Tigre fired more attempts (7 vs 6 shots).
- Tigre was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigre | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigre | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 259 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigre | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigre | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigre | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.