Match statistics snapshot
- Tigre fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 26%).
- Sao Paulo held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigre | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigre | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 338Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigre | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigre | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigre | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.