Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 10%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 518Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 599Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.