Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (18 vs 2 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 0%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 695Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 764Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.