Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Atletico San Luis was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 19%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 363 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 425 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |