Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 0.50, Δ 0.84).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Atletico San Luis was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.31 | Goals prevented | -1.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Atletico San Luis |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.