Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 0%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Cd Motagua |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Cd Motagua |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 465Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 533Lead | Total passes | 234 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Cd Motagua |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Cd Motagua |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Cd Motagua |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.