Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 27%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club America |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club America |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 521Lead | Total passes | 359 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club America |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club America |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club America |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |