Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- Club Queretaro was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 288 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.