Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (0.43 vs 0.31, Δ 0.12).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Club Queretaro was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 0.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.31 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 511Lead | Accurate passes | 142 |
| 585Lead | Total passes | 219 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.06 | Goals prevented | 0.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Queretaro |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |