Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8 | Shots off target | 8 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 556Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 632Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |