Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 17%).
- Club Tijuana held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 277 | Accurate passes | 366Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Club Tijuana |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.