Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 9 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 450 | Accurate passes | 524Lead |
| 531 | Total passes | 619Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.