Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 465Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Fc Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.