Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.75, Δ 0.82).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 449Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.71 | Goals prevented | -0.71 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Guadalajara Chivas |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.