Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (2.23 vs 0.96, Δ 1.27).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 470Lead | Accurate passes | 426 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 477 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.