Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target |
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 256 |
| 523Lead | Total passes | 341 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |