Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- Pachuca was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 23%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 14Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 456Lead | Accurate passes | 264 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.