Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 23%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 6Lead |
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 504Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.