Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Pachuca was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 281 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.