Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 483Lead |
| 290 | Total passes | 560Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.