Match statistics snapshot
- Real Salt Lake fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Real Salt Lake was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 517Lead | Total passes | 406 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |