Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 1.29, Δ 0.36).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 464 | Accurate passes | 556Lead |
| 522 | Total passes | 621Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.