Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 24%).
- San Jose Earthquakes held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 449Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 520Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.