Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | U.n.a.m. - Pumas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | U.n.a.m. - Pumas |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 291 |
| 456Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | U.n.a.m. - Pumas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | U.n.a.m. - Pumas |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | U.n.a.m. - Pumas |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |