Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
- Vancouver Whitecaps held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 408Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tigres Uanl | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |