Match statistics snapshot
- Tombense fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Tombense was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tombense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tombense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 297 | Accurate passes | 391Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tombense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tombense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tombense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |