Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.58, Δ 0.09).
- Tombense fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Tombense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tombense | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tombense | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tombense | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tombense | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tombense | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |