Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 22%).
- FC Porto held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tondela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tondela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tondela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tondela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tondela | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.