Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (0.50 vs 1.23, Δ 0.73).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Tondela was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tondela | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 0.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tondela | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tondela | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tondela | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.55 | Goals prevented | 0.55 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tondela | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |